maybe… they don’t trust that if they take in your view, they won’t lose touch with their own
it may not feel like it, because they may seem very aggressively confident
but if they were more grounded, they could more readily hold contrary views
…same goes for you!
so if you could somehow build your own trust that you won’t lose touch with what you know, even in the face of something contrary, then you’d have another way out of the paradox!
how would you do that?
in short, you behold what it is that you know, about whatever’s at hand
that all of that knowing is real, even if you’ve overgeneralized or misapplied it in some places
that you don’t have to let go of anything that’s real in order to take in something new
you might find that you need to recurse, because you actually have multiple subsystems that are blocked with the same paradox, where it’s hard for something to listen because it doesn’t feel heard
you might also find part of you is bitter that the other person isn’t putting in this work proactively
fair! listening to yourself is a substitute for unblocking, but not for actual connecting
but eventually, you’re ready to try another shot at listening to the other person’s view
eventually: wow. you can listen to the other person
what they’re saying, it turns out, is of great interest to you, because it’s often something you’ve been unable to take in thus far, so it’s key information that you’re hungry for!
taking in their perspective may feel painful, but it also feels like a relief
it requires focused attention, but not force or effort
and maybe partway through you need to pause and breathe, to reaffirm that everything that you know is still real and part of your sense of things
eventually you’ve made sense of something that previously you weren’t able to make sense of
and you have something of an integrated sense of your view and theirs
then… you might foray into getting them to understand you
and if they once again get defensive, you go back to seeking to understand them
and if you once again get defensive, then you go back to reaffirming your own view
but as long as you both have the patience, you can reach mutual understanding
in summary: 3 steps for empowered dialogue (3SED)
1. understand yourself so thoroughly that you have infinite space and curiosity to listen
2. understand the other so thoroughly that they have space to listen to you
3. get understood — what you wanted in the first place
empowered, because you’re never a victim of their unwillingness to listen. you always have a move.
(another ~20 minute onepager. read the other posts written in this style here. for a longer take on the 3SED process and how to DO each of the steps, read the secret to co-gnosis. for bullet-points specifically on step 1, read this one-pager on self-validation.)
About Malcolm
Constantly consciously expanding the boundaries of thoughtspace and actionspace.
Creator of Intend, a system for improvisationally & creatively staying in touch with what's most important to you, and taking action towards it.
Have your say!